For many years one of the best tools for real time keyword research was to type a keyword into Google – and then pause before hitting enter. This tactic resulted in suggestions that showed what the top 10 real time suggestions around a particular keyword.
For example, one could type a company name and then see suggestions around “Stock price”, “contact info” and “careers”.
Or for a real time search, here’s what people are searching for on Super Bowl topics:
However, it may be that these suggested results are batched and stem from certain words within the query. If this is the case, then these suggested queries are not going to be as helpful for determining what is popular.
Here are a couple queries that have the word “helps me to” and result in the same suggested phrases.
But it’s not just queries that have the word “helps me”. Anything that has a verb in the query seems to elicit non-standard queries in both of these cases the result has a song connection.
With the keyword “gives me” the results can get even weirder, but at least they are bipartisan.
There are still some really helpful Google suggestions that appear very brand/keyword specific, however, the results above indicate that it may be prudent to always qualify all suggested ideas with a keyword research tool. Some of this ideas look helpful, but others just look to similar to the ones above.
On May 25th 2018 the General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR as it is known became the law of the land in Europe. While the focus of GDPR is specifically to protect the digital privacy of European citizens, the effect of the law is global since it can be quite difficult for companies to manage data privacy differently for a single region of the world.
The one area of this law that was the most visible for every Internet user in the entire world was the requirement that companies/websites be transparent with users about the collection and retention of personal data. Nearly everyone implemented the transparency requirement by updating their privacy policies, the often neglected page written in small font legalese, with new information on how they are handling data.
The eagerness of websites to ensure that they are GDPR compliant has created an unprecedented opportunity to improve SEO crawlability and discovery. Effective technical SEO hinges on facilitating the efficient flow of crawlers throughout a website and passing the authority of incoming external links in a structured way to valuable pages. While this ideal might be easy to implement on a content or media property, it can be very challenging on a site that has dynamic monetization flows.
When there are very defined goals for a webpage like checkout, lead completes, or click to call, SEO will likely be pushed to the back burner. Adding links or SEO-specific modifications in this case will be in conflict with these laser-like goals and link flow could essentially be blockaded on this page. This reality could be especially painful when these dead end are pages that attract a significant amount of in-bound links. Those links may lift the domain authority of the site but are useless to individual pages that could benefit if the value were passed through to them.
Elaborating on the specific URL’s, with hyperlinks of course, where specific helpful information may be contained is aligned with the general theme of the privacy content. At a minimum, linking to an HTML sitemap with every single URL of the website can also contribute to the user’s understanding of the overall pages on the website.
Google seems to be testing where they place the URL for a specific result. In the test I noticed today, the URL is on top of the result. The result has the title and snippet, but Google is only showing the domain of the result and not the full path. I
Clicking the down error next to the domain only shows you the “cached” or “similar” options and there is no option to show the full URL path.
I like seeing the URL in a search result because I want to know if the result is a blog post, PDF or some other URL that I might not click. Additionally, there are times that I just want to copy the URL without clicking on it, and this option would no longer be available.
This gets really confusing when there are multiple results from the same domain.
According to Search Engine Land, Google’s new Hummingbird algorithm is supposed to be more “precise and fast,” putting greater emphasis on understanding the intent of the user’s query. As a part of Hummingbird, Google seems to now do more than focus target results to the query intent; they are also adjusting the search options navigation based on the perceived user intent.
Here are some examples of what appears to be a work in progress by Google.
When I searched Google I see a standard search options navigation showing “Web”, “Images”, “Maps”, “Shopping”, “News” and “More”.
Adding the word nav into the querymade Google think that I was looking for an application since they swapped “news” for “applications” as a search option.
When I searched Marketing Software the “News” option was replaced with “Patents”.
Showing “patents” as an option seems to make sense when the query contained software but when I swapped software with tools, Google replaced “patents” with “books.”
Curious, I queried the name of an actual book, Marketing in the Age of Google (by Vanessa Fox) to see if Google identified the query as a book. Unfortunately, Google thought that this query was for a video since they swapped the “books” option for “videos”.
I added the word book into the query to see if this would force “books” as a search option. However, Google’s intent matching was unable to recalculate so much so that they didn’t show any fifth option at all-only showing the four standard options.
Very specific queries,(Root Android 4.3 Forum) with the word forum showed “Discussions” as a search option…
But, if the query is less specific, (Android Forum) “discussions” is removed and the default “news” is shown instead.
Pasta dishes brings up “recipes” as a search option.
As expected, SEO blogs shows “blogs” as an option.
Changing the Google search options based on user queries seems to be in its very early stages; however, this feature could be useful for anyone trying to figure out how Google might classify a keyword.